| Awards and Outreach | -> | Genesis Award - 2001 (Co-Winner) |

The purpose
of this experiment was to examine the effect of group size on division of labor
in social groups. The ability of social
groups to delegate tasks among specialists must depend in part on redundancy,
or the number of individuals relative to the number of necessary tasks. Thus, we hypothesized that task
specialization should increase with group size.
To test this, we placed groups of two, four and six foundresses
of the ant species Messor pergandei into soil filled chambers and observed their
performance of a single task, excavation.
We also placed groups of two and six foundresses in observation nests and monitored variation in performance of surface excavation,
tunnel excavation and brood care.
We found that task specialization indeed increases with group size. The foundresses
observed in pairs showed little specialization, while foundresses
in the larger groups demonstrated significant specialization. How I explain this best is by using the
example of two people living in an apartment.
The carpet needs to be vacuumed, the dishes have to be done, the beds
need to be changed and the rooms need to be dusted. All tasks take energy, so the roommates share
them all. Then they decide to have two
friends move in. Now two of them can
trade off vacuuming, one can do the dishes and one can change the sheets and
dust. They then decide to have two more
friends move in. Now two can still be trading off on the vacuuming, two
can do the dishes, since now there are more dishes to be done, one can change the sheets on the beds and one can dust. In other ant species specialization comes
with a significant
survival cost; excavators often die.
However, in this species there was no significant correlation between
the fourndress who excavated and foundress
survival. This suggests this species has
evolved a system to distribute work effort more equitable among individual foundresses, offsetting negative costs of task
specialization.